Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Kejriwal and his political instincts

People are dispensing political advice to Arvind Kejriwal. But by the looks of it, he doesn't need any. Till now he's been ahead of the political game. He rode the Anna's anti-corruption movement that was also supported by BJP for its anti-congress tone. He then announced a political party at an opportune time - when almost everyone (except BJP) was suggesting that instead of the disruptive anarchy they should come up with a constructive program and form a political party - almost as if accepting a challenge. Less than a year later, AAP emerged as the second largest party in Delhi.

And even now he has played his hands well. AAP showed initial reluctance to form the government with Congress support, forcing BJP and Congress to criticize it for shirking the responsibility. And now when they're forming the government, BJP looks self-contradictory in criticizing it for taking Congress' support. Congress may be trying to expose AAP as a party that can not govern by making its working difficult, but of all the 3 parties, AAP is on surer ground. If at some point Congress brings down the government, APP can quite happily play the victim card. In fact, they are already making appropriate noise regarding this. And in such an eventuality, AAP can only gain - it will retain its present voters and will gain the fence sitters who were earlier unsure of voting for a new party. The only danger for AAP now is to be seen as backing away from its poll promises - which they should be able avoid. So, Congress is in tough position - if they support AAP, it gains credibility; if they don't it will play victim.

The political idiom that AAP is using may be unconventional, but there's absolutely nothing to suggest that Kejriwal lacks political instincts. BJP, hoping to ride anti-Congress sentiment in urban areas, is therefore also suitably worried.
Kejriwal and his political instinctsSocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Propensity towards Conspiracy Theories

Unable to contemplate beyond binaries, the limited mind, when confronted with the greater possibilities of the world, found a useful and convenient tool in the conspiracy theory. If something is not with us, the limited mind thought, then it must surely be a conspiracy against us.

Fun exercise: Observe a person, an organization or a political group that is predisposed towards conspiracy theories. More than an even chance that they also have an essentially limited and rigid world view.
Propensity towards Conspiracy Theories SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Monday, December 9, 2013


So, I had this epiphany which seems rather straightforward now but let me still share it.

It started with reading how our 3D vision works - the basic stuff. How each of our eyes only provides just a 2D image to our mind; with no depth information. It is the mind that then synthesizes these two ever so slightly different 2D images to construct a field of vision that has a third dimension -- depth -- in it.

I think it's a very useful analogy to also think about how we construct much of our conception of the reality around us. The more different types of perspectives we can bring to bear on this reality -- social, political, economical, cultural, historical -- the more "depth", in some relevant and useful sense, we can perceive in the synthesized view.

A corollary to this is that the more you align or identify closely with a particular ideology or a way of looking at things, the more "depth" you may be giving up.

Of course, nothing earth-shatteringly original about this line of thought, but yeah it caught my fancy.
PerspectivesSocialTwist Tell-a-Friend